We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker. PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
No comments yet, be the first to start the discussion!
I would start treatment with abiraterone and prednisone.
Sipuleucel-T along with Zoladex and to include Zometa with his taking a calcium supplement .
Second, check for any studies with Abiraterone acetate.
Jacques Planas: What makes you choose abiraterone in this setting over enzalutamide?
Richard Ealy: How do your patients respond to the lack of observable improvement with sipuleucel-T? Do they not desire a treatment that will biochemically and/or radiographically give evidence of response? Also, when would you initiate AA after having given sipuleucel-T?
I would switch to Firmagon and see if there was a response. If not, I would try estrogen patches.
Stu Hyatt: Switching to Firmagon from Lupron seems reasonable, as there is an RCT-proven benefit in progression-free survival. Additionally, the PATCH trial had convincing data for estrogen patches in this situation. However, it hasn't seemed to have picked up in common practice. Do you have good experience with this?
Patient was on Firmagon for about seven or eight mths and then there was a slow rise. Switched to three weekly estrogen patches (0.1 mg). At start PSADT was about 2 mths and that has increased to 25 mths. Still very slow rise in PSA which could probably be reversed by using four patches a week. Patient is satisfied.
As a survivor and leader of a PCa support group, we notice there seems to be no consensus even among oncologists(urologists are another story) using Abiraterone before or after Enzalutamide or when to start Sip-T, How about Radium 223 , now rather then later?
I'll start chemotherapy
@Robert Sherman: Radium-223 has been shown to increase overall survival and is a great drug. However, it is indicated in patients with symptomatic bone metastases and no evidence of visceral metastases (so it would not apply to the patient in the above vignette). It was shown last year to be beneficial in both the pre- and post-docetaxel phase, but the landmark trial which Radium-223 got its approval based on (ALSYMPCA), was designed before abiraterone and enzalutamide were available. So the question of it's sequence in relation to those two drugs is less well known. I understand your feelings about everyone in the medical community sometimes seeming to be on a different page, but it's an evidence-based world we live in, and thus, our hands are often tied on what we can appropriately/ethically do. Decisions based on our own clinical opinion must be weighed against the evidence that is widely available and accepted by peers in the community.
Pending Moderator approval.
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This can't be undone.