We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
story of the week
Published in Clinical Dentistry

Journal Scan / Research · April 16, 2020

Saving Compromised Teeth With Periodontal Regeneration Compares Favorably to Extraction and Replacement in the Long Term

Journal of Clinical Periodontology

 

Additional Info

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Periodontal Regeneration Versus Extraction and Dental Implant or Prosthetic Replacement of Teeth Severely Compromised by Attachment Loss to the Apex: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Reporting 10-Year Outcomes, Survival Analysis and Mean Cumulative Cost of Recurrence
J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020 Apr 06;[EPub Ahead of Print], P Cortellini, G Stalpers, A Mollo, MS Tonetti

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading