Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Prevalence and Predictors for Being Unscreened for Diabetic Retinopathy
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract now Full Text Available for ClinicalKey SubscribersOBJECTIVE
To determine the population-level predictors for being unscreened for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among individuals with diabetes in a developed country.
DESIGN
A retrospective population-based repeated-cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
All individuals with diabetes (types 1 and 2) aged ≥20 years in the universal health care system in Ontario were identified in the 2011-2013 and 2017-2019 time periods.
METHODS
The Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the relative risk (RR) comparison of subcategories stratified by the 2 cross-sectional time periods.
RESULTS
A total of 1 145 645 and 1 346 578 individuals with diabetes were identified in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively. The proportion of patients unscreened for DR declined very slightly from 35% (n = 405 967) in 2011-2013 to 34% (n = 455 027) in 2017-2019 of the population with diabetes (RR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.964-0.9693; p < 0.0001). Young adults aged 20-39 years of age had the highest proportion of unscreened patients (62% and 58% in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively). Additionally, those who had a lower income quintile (RR = 1.039; 95% CI, 1.036-1.044; p < 0.0001), were recent immigrants (RR = 1.286; 95% CI, 1.280-1.293; p < 0.0001), lived in urban areas (RR = 1.149; 95% CI, 1.145-1.154; p < 0.0001), had a mental health history (RR = 1.117; 95% CI, 1.112-1.122; p < 0.0001), or lacked a connection to a primary care provider (RR = 1.656; 95% CI, 1.644-1.668; p < 0.0001) had a higher risk of being unscreened.
CONCLUSIONS
This population-based study suggests that over 1 decade, 33% of individuals with diabetes are unscreened for DR, and young age, low income, immigration, residing in a large city, mental health illness, and no primary care access are the main predictors.
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Prevalence and predictors for being unscreened for diabetic retinopathy: a population-based study over a decade
Can J Ophthalmol 2022 May 13;[EPub Ahead of Print], T Felfeli, G Katsnelson, A Kiss, L Plumptre, JM Paterson, BG Ballios, ED Mandelcorn, RH Glazier, MH Brent, DT WongFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of blindness among working-age adults aged between 20 and 74 years in the US. DR affects >5.3 million Americans aged ≥18 years.1 Over time, more than half of the population with diabetes will develop diabetic retinopathy.2 This retrospective study used several databases to assess the prevalence and population-level predictors for people with diabetes who were not screened for DR.
This study, one the largest of its type, included approximately 14 million individuals in Ontario enrolled in the single-payer Canadian healthcare system. It found that approximately 1.2 to 1.3 million people had diabetes from 2011 to 2013 and from 2017 to 2019. Approximately 35% of people with diabetes were not screened for DR. The predictors for not being screened were: young adults, low income, immigrants, residents in large cities, history of mental illness, and no primary care access. Surprisingly about 55% of those not screened for DR did not have a primary care provider.
Screening for DR is important as it may prevent vision loss and blindness. Individuals with type 2 diabetes are recommended to complete their first eye examination at the time of diagnosis of diabetes, irrespective of age. Those with type 1 diabetes aged between 10 and 15 years or older should have their first eye examination within 5 years of diagnosis.3
The results that 35% of people with diabetes were not screened suggest that a community-wide approach is needed to ensure that all people with diabetes are screened for DR. To maximize success, everyone who interacts with these unscreened people should help them be screened. This would include primary care providers, specialists, pharmacists, employers, government agencies overseeing income supplementation and immigration status, public health agencies, media (public service advertisements), and clinics in non-traditional settings such as retail and drug stores. To minimize cost and maximize participation, current teleretinal screening programs in the US could be expanded to include private practices.4-6
References