Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.

In an effort to better serve our users, we have streamlined our content offering. As a result, we no longer publish new content or update existing content in Urology. Visit the 'Content & Subscriptions' tab of your Settings page at any time to update your Dashboard or Newsletter Subscription preferences to continue to see news and information that interests you most.

featured
Published in Urology

Expert Opinion / Interview · August 29, 2013

IMRT vs Conventional Radiotherapy Following Prostatectomy

Written by
W Robert Lee MD, MS, MEd

 

Additional Info

  1. Goldin GH, Sheets NC, Meyer AM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(12):1136-1143.

  2. Cooperberg MR. Expanding utilization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: soaring costs, dubious benefits: comment on "Comparative effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy." JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(12):1143-1144.

Advanced Prostate Cancer Center of Excellence

Visit our Advanced Prostate Cancer Center of Excellence for additional, in-depth coverage.


Further Reading