Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Glycine Powder Air-Abrasive Therapy for Peri-Implant Mucositis Results in Early and Sustained Changes in Clinical Parameters and Peri-Implant Microbiome
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowAIM
Peri-implant mucositis, a dysbiosis-driven inflammatory disease, is a precursor to peri-implantitis, underscoring the need for early disease management. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of glycine powder in resolving clinical inflammation and restoring host-microbial homeostasis.
METHODS
Thirty subjects were randomized to receive either glycine powder air-abrasive debridement or ultrasonic instrumentation. Clinical parameters (probe depth [PD], modified Sulcular Bleeding Index [mSBI], modified Plaque Index [mPlI]), biofilm and peri-implant crevicular fluid were collected at baseline and at 1-day, 1-, 3-, 6-weeks and 3- and 6-months post-therapy. Microbial recolonization was examined using 16S rDNA sequencing and immune response was semi-quantified using a bead-based 17-plex microarray.
RESULTS
At 6-months, both groups demonstrated non-significant reductions in mSBI when compared to baseline (p > 0.05, Wald test, mixed model for repeated measures). However, mSBI and PD decreased in the test group from week-1 to 3-months, while control group decreased at 1- and 3-weeks only. mSBI was lower in the test group when compared to controls from Week-1 to 3-months, while PD differed between groups at 6 weeks and 3-months. Glycine group demonstrated significant microbial shifts after 24-h, increases in species richness and health-compatible species, and loss of pathobionts (p < 0.001, Dunn test). Pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased from 1- to 6-weeks or 3-months (p < 0.05, Wald test). Comparable results were obtained in the ultrasonic group at 3-weeks and sustained over 6-weeks post-therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Glycine therapy leads to early and sustained change in host-microbial interactions when compared to ultrasonics, however, the changes wrought by both therapies were sustained for a maximum of 3 months.
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Impact of Glycine Powder Air-Abrasive Debridement on Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Randomized Control Trial of Clinical, Microbial, and Immunological Changes
Clin Oral Implants Res 2024 Sep 28;[EPub Ahead of Print], B Partido, S Saraswat, PS KumarFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
This study investigated the effect of air polishing with glycine powder compared with that of using ultrasonic scalers on implant surfaces to help treat peri-implant mucositis. Using a randomized control trial study design, 30 university-based patients on a 3-month dental hygiene maintenance therapy interval with at least one implant were selected for this research. At their 3-month maintenance appointment, one-half of the patients had their implant hand-scaled and air-polished with glycine powder, and the other one-half received hand scaling and treatment with an implant-safe ultrasonic insert. Patient evaluations were performed at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment to track the variables, including changes in the microbiome and inflammatory markers.
The glycine group showed a progressive increase in species diversity from 1 week to 6 months, indicating that more beneficial bacteria are found in the microbiome of the glycine group than in the microbiome of the ultrasonic group. This outcome may be attributed to the ability of glycine to inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis in gram-positive and gram-negative organisms in a manner similar to that of an antibiotic, allowing for a faster return to normobiosis and resolution of peri-mucositis.
With the increase in implant placement, implant maintenance should be a priority for long-term success during routine hygiene care. This study highlights an option to improve peri-implant care, particularly for patients at risk of peri-implantitis due to a history of periodontitis or suboptimal oral hygiene.