Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Features and Medicolegal Implications of Diagnostic Omission for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowEarly diagnosis of oncologic pathologies has a crucial role to determine patient's prognosis and therapeutic path. Nonetheless, clinical errors and omissions that can occur during diagnostic, as well as detection of preneoplastic or neoplastic condition, may result in devasting consequences both for patients in terms of health and for professionals in terms of medico-legal responsibility. This study is aimed at examining in depth, through the presentation of a specific clinical case, the medico-legal aspects inherent to the diagnosis of oral cancer, analyzing the preventive, interceptive, and diagnostic strategies, the legal implications of clinical evaluation errors and diagnostic omission, and the type of medical damage produced and professional liability. The medico-legal landscape surrounding oral squamous cell carcinoma is multifaceted and characterized by diagnostic challenges, treatment complexities, and legal considerations. Health-care providers must remain vigilant in navigating these complexities to ensure optimal patient care while mitigating legal risks. By prioritizing high-quality medical records, fostering transparent communication with patients, and implementing preventive strategies, health-care institutions can strive to minimize the incidence of litigation and uphold standards of ethical practice in oral carcinoma cases. Additionally, continued research and education in forensic and legal medicine are essential in informing evidence-based practices and promoting patient safety in this evolving field.
Additional Info
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Features and Medico-Legal Implications of Diagnostic Omission
Case Rep Dent 2024 Nov 01;2024(xx)2578271, D Albano, A Argo, G Bilello, E Cumbo, M Lupatelli, P Messina, FM Sciarra, M Sessa, S Zerbo, GA ScardinaFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Dentists play an oversized role in screening and detecting oral cancer. But are we living up to that responsibility? In this article, Albano et al highlight the importance of oral cancer screening, detection, and treatment as well as how early detection significantly impacts the outcomes. Among patients with newly diagnosed oral squamous cell carcinoma, 70% are diagnosed in the late stage (III or IV), thus decreasing the 5-year survival rate to below 40% compared with early detection in stages I and II with an 80% or greater 5-year survival rate. This is a meaningful difference in survival outcomes. As dentists, we see our patients more frequently, often every 6 months, than our physician counterparts. This gives us an opportunity to help educate our patients and screen and detect oral cancer earlier. Are we doing this for all our patients at every visit? If we are, are we communicating that to our patients and documenting the screening? This brings up important medicolegal issues and the adage “if it’s not written down, it never happened.” This study noted that the most common reason for oral cancer malpractice cases is due to a failure to diagnose, with several studies showing the compounded significance of poor documentation in these cases.
What can we do to protect our patients and ourselves?
Together, we can help increase awareness, with the goal of reducing late-stage diagnoses. Never underestimate the impact you can have when performing an oral cancer screening. You can literally save someone’s life.