We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
featured
Published in Dermatology

Journal Scan / Research · July 05, 2021

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Silymarin Versus Low Fluence 1064-nm Q Switched Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Melasma

Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

 

Additional Info

Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
Efficacy and Safety of Topical Silymarin Versus Low Fluence 1064-nm Q Switched Nd:YAG Laser in the Treatment of Melasma: A Comparative Randomized Trial
Lasers Surg Med 2021 Jun 08;[EPub Ahead of Print], SMA Ibrahim, AS Farag, MS Ali, WMAF El-Gendy

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading