Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
You're enjoying temporary access to this content

Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying temporary access to this content. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.

Already Have An Account? Log in Now

Published in Clinical Dentistry

Journal Scan / Research · August 01, 2023

Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques Led to Similar Clinical Outcomes in Tooth- and Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses

Evidence-Based Dentistry




This abstract is available on the publisher's site.

Access this abstract now  

Additional Info

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

Evidence-Based Dentistry
Clinical outcomes of implant-supported and tooth-supported fixed prostheses fabricated from digital versus analogue impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Evid Based Dent 2023 Jun 27;[EPub Ahead of Print], NS Mahat, NY Shetty, S Kohli, NB Jamayet, P Patil

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading