We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
Published in Cardiology

Journal Scan / Research · January 08, 2021

Clinical Efficacy of Echocardiography vs Magnetic Resonance for Chronic Aortic Regurgitation

European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging


Additional Info

European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging
A Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance for Chronic Aortic Regurgitation
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020 Dec 17;[EPub Ahead of Print], A Postigo, E Pérez-David, A Revilla, LA Raquel, A González-Mansilla, R Prieto-Arévalo, MÁ Espinosa, RA López-Jimenez, T Sevilla, N Urueña, P Martínez-Legazpi, JM Oliver, F Fernández-Avilés, SR J Alberto, J Bermejo

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading