Download from app store
We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.

In an effort to better serve our users, we have streamlined our content offering. As a result, we no longer publish new content or update existing content in Urology. Visit the 'Content & Subscriptions' tab of your Settings page at any time to update your Dashboard or Newsletter Subscription preferences to continue to see news and information that interests you most.

Published in Urology

Journal Scan / Research · November 09, 2021

Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy vs Benign Prostatic Obstruction Surgery

European Urology Focus


Additional Info

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

European Urology Focus
Early Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Stress Urinary Incontinence Following Radical Prostatectomy or Benign Prostatic Obstruction Surgery: Results of a Large Multicentric Study
Eur Urol Focus 2021 Sep 18;[EPub Ahead of Print], HGA Dupuis, I Bentellis, M El-Akri, T Brierre, T Cousin, V Gaillard, B Poussot, T Tricard, N Hermieu, D Robin, A Pitout, F Beraud, M Durand, D Chevallier, F Bruyere, X Biardeau, H Monsaint, L Corbel, P Leon, JF Hermieu, P Lecoanet, G Capon, X Game, C Saussine, B Peyronnet, JN Cornu

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading