Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowBACKGROUND
Subclinical atrial fibrillation is short-lasting and asymptomatic and can usually be detected only by long-term continuous monitoring with pacemakers or defibrillators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke by a factor of 2.5; however, treatment with oral anticoagulation is of uncertain benefit.
METHODS
We conducted a trial involving patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation lasting 6 minutes to 24 hours. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind, double-dummy design to receive apixaban at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily when indicated) or aspirin at a dose of 81 mg daily. The trial medication was discontinued and anticoagulation started if subclinical atrial fibrillation lasting more than 24 hours or clinical atrial fibrillation developed. The primary efficacy outcome, stroke or systemic embolism, was assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all the patients who had undergone randomization); the primary safety outcome, major bleeding, was assessed in the on-treatment population (all the patients who had undergone randomization and received at least one dose of the assigned trial drug, with follow-up censored 5 days after permanent discontinuation of trial medication for any reason).
RESULTS
We included 4012 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 76.8±7.6 years and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3.9±1.1 (scores range from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of stroke); 36.1% of the patients were women. After a mean follow-up of 3.5±1.8 years, stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 55 patients in the apixaban group (0.78% per patient-year) and in 86 patients in the aspirin group (1.24% per patient-year) (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.88; P = 0.007). In the on-treatment population, the rate of major bleeding was 1.71% per patient-year in the apixaban group and 0.94% per patient-year in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.57; P = 0.001). Fatal bleeding occurred in 5 patients in the apixaban group and 8 patients in the aspirin group.
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation, apixaban resulted in a lower risk of stroke or systemic embolism than aspirin but a higher risk of major bleeding. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; ARTESIA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01938248.).
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Apixaban for Stroke Prevention in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
N. Engl. J. Med 2023 Nov 12;[EPub Ahead of Print], JS Healey, RD Lopes, CB Granger, M Alings, L Rivard, WF McIntyre, D Atar, DH Birnie, G Boriani, AJ Camm, D Conen, JW Erath, MR Gold, SH Hohnloser, J Ip, J Kautzner, V Kutyifa, C Linde, P Mabo, G Mairesse, J Benezet Mazuecos, J Cosedis Nielsen, F Philippon, M Proietti, C Sticherling, JA Wong, DJ Wright, IG Zarraga, SB Coutts, A Kaplan, M Pombo, F Ayala-Paredes, L Xu, K Simek, S Nevills, R Mian, SJ ConnollyFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Every fifth implanted pacemaker, defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or loop recorder detects short episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF). These show the features of AF, but the events are rare and short. Whether these episodes of device-detected AF require anticoagulation was tested in two randomized double-blind studies comparing the outcomes between anticoagulation therapy with an NOAC (apixaban or edoxaban) and aspirin (ARTESiA1) or among an NOAC, aspirin, and no antiplatelet therapy based on accepted indications (NOAH-AFNET 62). Both studies show consistent results.3 There are two pieces of good news for patients with device-detected AF in the results:
Like many robust studies, the results call for more evidence; the low stroke rate and the weak but unambiguous effect of anticoagulation call for research into better methods to estimate stroke risk in patients with rare and short episodes of AF. Such research may integrate arrhythmia burden, genetic information, and quantitative proxies of atrial, ventricular, and vascular function (eg, biomolecules).
Until such research reports become available, clinical advice on the management of patients with device-detected AF will continue to rely on conversations explaining the benefits and risks of anticoagulation, with shared decision–making tailored to the values and needs of each patient.
Reference