We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker.
PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
featured
Published in Urology

Journal Scan / Research · May 10, 2017

Antibiotic Coating of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Is it Worthwhile?

Urology

 

Additional Info

Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:

Urology
Antibiotic Coating of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AMS 800): Is it Worthwhile?
Urology 2017 May 01;103(xx)179-184, T Hüsch, A Kretschmer, F Thomsen, D Kronlachner, M Kurosch, A Obaje, R Anding, T Pottek, A Rose, R Olianas, A Friedl, W Hübner, R Homberg, J Pfitzenmaier, U Grein, F Queissert, CM Naumann, J Schweiger, C Wotzka, J Nyarangi-Dix, T Hofmann, K Ulm, RM Bauer, A Haferkamp

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Further Reading