Welcome to PracticeUpdate! We hope you are enjoying access to a selection of our top-read and most recent articles. Please register today for a free account and gain full access to all of our expert-selected content.
Already Have An Account? Log in Now
Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
abstract
This abstract is available on the publisher's site.
Access this abstract nowPURPOSE
APHINITY, at 45 months median follow-up, showed that pertuzumab added to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00], P = .045) for patients with early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC), specifically those with node-positive or hormone receptor (HR)-negative disease. We now report the preplanned second interim overall survival (OS) and descriptive updated IDFS analysis with 74 months median follow-up.
METHODS
After surgery and central HER2-positive confirmation, 4,805 patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative BC were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 1-year pertuzumab or placebo added to standard adjuvant chemotherapy and 1-year trastuzumab.
RESULTS
This interim OS analysis comparing pertuzumab versus placebo did not reach the P = .0012 level required for statistical significance (P = .17, hazard ratio 0.85). Six-year OS were 95% versus 94% with 125 deaths (5.2%) versus 147 (6.1%), respectively. IDFS analysis based on 508 events (intent-to-treat population) showed a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91) and 6-year IDFS of 91% and 88% for pertuzumab and placebo groups, respectively. The node-positive cohort continues to derive clear IDFS benefit from pertuzumab (hazard ratio 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.87]), 6-year IDFS being 88% and 83%, respectively. Benefit was not seen in the node-negative cohort. In a subset analysis, IDFS benefit from pertuzumab showed a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92) for HR-positive disease and a hazard ratio of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.10) for HR-negative disease. Primary cardiac events remain < 1% in both the treatment groups. No new safety signals were seen.
CONCLUSION
This analysis confirms the IDFS benefit from adding pertuzumab to standard adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive HER2-positive early BC. Longer follow-up is needed to fully assess OS benefit.
Additional Info
Disclosure statements are available on the authors' profiles:
Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the APHINITY Trial: 6 Years' Follow-Up
J. Clin. Oncol 2021 Feb 04;[EPub Ahead of Print], M Piccart, M Procter, D Fumagalli, E de Azambuja, E Clark, MS Ewer, E Restuccia, G Jerusalem, S Dent, L Reaby, H Bonnefoi, I Krop, TW Liu, T Pieńkowski, M Toi, N Wilcken, M Andersson, YH Im, LM Tseng, HJ Lueck, M Colleoni, E Monturus, M Sicoe, S Guillaume, J Bines, RD Gelber, G Viale, C ThomssenFrom MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Oncology
Treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer continues to evolve rapidly. Increased utilization of the neoadjuvant approach has been driven by high pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and the results of the KATHERINE trial, which demonstrated substantial benefit with T-DM1 as adjuvant therapy in patients without pCR.
The APHINITY trial, in contrast, explored adjuvant pertuzumab (PTZ) added to standard chemotherapy and trastuzumab with dual anti-HER2 antibodies continued to complete a year of therapy. The preplanned time-driven interim analysis presented now in JCO shows a significant iDFS benefit of 3.2% favoring PTZ at 6 years of follow-up (HR, 0.76; 0.64–0.91). Overall survival was not different: 94.8% versus 93.9% (P = .17). Examining relevant subgroups, the two-thirds of patients in APHINITY who had lymph node–positive disease had an improvement in their iDFS with PTZ of 4.5% at 6 years, whereas the node-negative population did extremely well overall, with an iDFS of 95% whether or not they received PTZ. Contrary to the first report of this study at 4 years of follow-up, now both HR-positive and HR-negative subgroups benefited from PTZ in terms of iDFS (2.5% improvement in HR-negative and 3% in HR-positive patients).
APHINITY provides several important findings and lessons: