We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker. PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
No comments yet, be the first to start the discussion!
Recent studies have shown an survival advantage when abiraterone plus docetaxel is used in the novo metastatic hormone sensitive PC. Adding docetaxel may be something to consider and discuss with the patient.
I do opt for addition of SBRT to the primary tumor to the present treatment as long as there is marvellous response with disappearance of all mets and only small residual at primary site
Add SBRT to primary tumor to present treatment. Question why Orgovix replaced Firmagon given that it is an oral medication and may not be covered by many insurers unless covered by Medicare Plan D. Also, not certain it is any more effective than Firmagon. Given that ADT has been effective to date, metastasis found to have disappeared, and lab results as desired, continue ADT, but target the tumor to hopefully clear this patient's PCa activity
Orgavix changed from formalin due to physical symptoms/reaction at site of injection- patient states his overall performance status improved and side effects lessoned following the switch.
Christos: Did patient have to pay for the Orgovyx (relugolix) ?
Insurance covered with copay of $35
And all labs stayed good- PSA dropped to 0.04 and T level still <10 x 3 months of use
Would anyone get PSMA PET since initially high volume metastasis converted to low volume
I am trying to make sure reinsurance coverage for this oral medication in order to advise patients if considering. Dear Christos: Thus, was this patient covered by, and was it, Medicare Part D? The importance to patients is, of course, since this is otherwise an extremely expensive medication. As to PSMA PET: if you mean as a 68 Ga-labeled, PSMA-targeted radiotracer, Ga 68 PSMA-11 used with PET/CT and PET/MRI with what is known as the patient's current status, it would appear unnecessary at this time.
He has private employer supplied insurance- If planning Lu-177 then he will need a PSMA PET
For Christos: Thank you for submitting this case for discussion and for your responses to my remarks. I have been a mentor online to men diagnosed and to their caregivers for over two decades. If interested, type Charles (Chuck) Maack in the internet search box and result will direct you to my website. I was hoping Dr. Sartor might comment here, so we shall see.
I notice no one has yet commented regarding the presence of Germ Line BARD1 and Somatic BRAFV463 Mutation. Here, as well, based on the patients current status, it appears they are not having any effect on the patient's significant improvement with current ADT medications so, if anything, keeping aware and if things begin to go haywire, look further into this presence to determine if playing any role in the change of status.
Pending Moderator approval.
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This can't be undone.