We have detected that you are using an Ad Blocker. PracticeUpdate is free to end users but we rely on advertising to fund our site. Please consider supporting PracticeUpdate by whitelisting us in your ad blocker.
We have sent a message to the email address you have provided, . If this email is not correct, please update your settings with your correct address.
The email address you provided during registration, , does not appear to be valid. Please update your settings with a valid address before to continue using PracticeUpdate.
Please provide your AHPRA Number to ensure that you are given the correct level of access to our site.
Explore
Advanced Melanoma
Center of Excellence
Interested in receiving weekly updates about the Advanced Melanoma Center of Excellence?
You can find your saved items on your dashboard, in the "saved" tab.
You've recommended your first item
Your recommendations help us improve our content suggestions for you and other PracticeUpdate members.
You've subscribed to your first topic alert
What does that mean?
Each day, we'll check to see if new items have been published to the topics you're subscribed to, and we'll send you one email with all of the new items from that day.
We'll keep all topic alert notifications available on your dashboard for 30 days, to make sure you don't miss anything.
Lastly, whenever you have unread items in the topics you've subscribed to, the "Alerts" icon will light up in the main menu. Just click on the bell to see your five most-recent, unread notifications.
Sign in to PracticeUpdate
Only registered members have full access to PracticeUpdate content.
No comments yet, be the first to start the discussion!
Ari VanderWalde
It appears that the patient started on adjuvant nivolumab. Did the patient complete a full year of treatment, or did he progress while on adjuvant therapy? If the former, it is reasonable to restart nivolumab therapy, preferably together with ipilimumab. Even if the latter, there is some Phase II evidence that adding ipilimumab to PD-1 therapy after progression on PD1 may result in a response rate of up to 25%. The definitive trial, S1616, has yet to report out, but in the absence of this, it remains a reasonable option before embarking on more heroic therapies.
Apr 21, 2021
Pending Moderator approval.
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This can't be undone.
Ari VanderWalde
It appears that the patient started on adjuvant nivolumab. Did the patient complete a full year of treatment, or did he progress while on adjuvant therapy? If the former, it is reasonable to restart nivolumab therapy, preferably together with ipilimumab. Even if the latter, there is some Phase II evidence that adding ipilimumab to PD-1 therapy after progression on PD1 may result in a response rate of up to 25%. The definitive trial, S1616, has yet to report out, but in the absence of this, it remains a reasonable option before embarking on more heroic therapies.